Search Results for "terrorist attack"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case. Deemed Bona Fide Passenger's Fall Due to Jerk is Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989.

The Union of India appealed against the award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, which granted compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with 6% inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Accidental Fall from Train Due to Jerk. Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to ₹8,00,000 Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The present appeal was filed by the Union of India under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the award dated 20.08.2025 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Untoward Incident Presumed Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's fall from train due to sudden jerk or push constitutes an untoward incident; railway's defense of suicide or self-inflicted injury not established.

The appellants, being the father, mother, and brother of the deceased Ganesh Vasanta Kajale, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Untoward Incident Compensation Case — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, South Central Railway, against the judgment and award dated 24th April 2008 passed by the Railway Claims T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger Status Upheld. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence or self-inflicted injury lies on the railway.

The case involves an appeal by the dependents of Kiran Yennam, who died in an alleged untoward incident on 04.03.2010. The claimants, his wife, minor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Passenger Rule Applied. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence is not on the claimant.

The appellants, being the wife, minor son, and parents of the deceased Lahu Kotlapure, filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Operation of Deccan Odyssey Luxury Train Outside Maharashtra. Court holds that the train was conceived as a national tourism project and its operation outside the state does not violate any statutory or contractual obligation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Harshad Gawade, an agriculturist and local tour operator, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed 'Passenger' Under Railways Act Despite Free Pass. Free travel pass issued by Railway Recruitment Board constitutes valid ticket for 'untoward incident' compensation under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Smt. Vaishali wd/o Nitesh Bhalerao, filed a claim for compensation of Rs. 7 lakhs before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, fol...