Search Results for "technicalities"

516 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Senior Citizens Tribunal Order in Property Dispute Between Mother and Son. Maintenance and Property Rights Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Upheld.

The petitioner, Shri Sambhaji Balkrishna Zambre, challenged the order dated 23/09/2025 passed by the Appellate Officer, Senior Citizens Welfare Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused as Signature on Cheque Admitted and Statutory Notice Complied With.

The appellant, M/s. Indian Potash Limited, a company engaged in importing and marketing fertilizers, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights in Land Reforms Case — Tribunal Failed to Consider Evidence and Conduct Proper Inquiry Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioner, K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights to Respondents 3 and 4 Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Adverse Possession.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives) challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting application for condonation of delay by applying strict standards instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between family members. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting delay condonation application by applying strict limitation principles instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed Regular Civil Suit No.155 of 2007 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Technical Dismissal Set Aside. Claim Petition Under Workmen's Compensation Act Cannot Be Dismissed for Non-Production of Original Documents When Copies Are Available and No Prejudice Is Caused.

The case arises from a claim petition filed by the deceased workman Gajanan under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, seeking compensation for injur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation to Rs.40,000 per acre set aside as it relied on unproven sale deeds and failed to consider the land's quality and location.

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) acquired land belonging to respondent no....