Search Results for "state excise duty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "state excise duty"

701 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 701 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Excise Licenses for Stock Discrepancy and Rule Violations. Petitioner Failed to Maintain Proper Records and Appointed Manager Without Intimation, Violating Goa, Daman and Diu Excise Duty Rules, 1964.

13 Sep 2023

The Petitioner, Manjuben Mukesh Tandel, proprietor of Infinity Traders, held two excise licenses for wholesale sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMF...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Section 11D Demand for Ethanol Blended Petrol. The court held that CESTAT erred in setting aside demand under Section 11D of Central Excise Act, 1944 merely because duty was not separately shown in invoice, as duty was collected as part of composite price.

18 Jul 2023

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate appealed against an order of CESTAT, Mumbai dated 31 August 2020, which allowed the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds SC/ST Reservation in Excise Licenses — CL-7D Rules Valid. Amendment to Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 providing concessional licenses to SC/ST hotel owners is not arbitrary or unconstitutional.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioner, B Govindraj Hegde, Secretary of the Federation of Wine Merchants Association, Karnataka, challenged the vires of the Karnataka Excise ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

20 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

7 Oct 2014

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Total Waiver Established. Structural glazing, once erected, becomes immovable property and is not excisable under Heading 76.10 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

21 Dec 2011

The appellant, MS Alumayer India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in fabrication and erection of structural glazing. They purchase aluminum angles/profiles, glas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty on Mosquito Coils Classified as Insecticides — Unjust Enrichment Defence Rejected. Product Held to Be Insecticide by CEGAT and Supreme Court; Duty Paid Under Protest and Burden Not Passed on to Consumers, Hence Refund Cannot Be Denied Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

20 Jul 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Chemicals Limited and its Managing Director, held a Central Excise Registration for manufacturing 'Toys, Brand Mosquito C...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)