Supreme Court Rules Appeal Does Not Abate if Estate is Sufficiently Represented.
12 Jan 2026This judgment concerns two connected civil appeals arising from suits for specific performance and eviction. In Civil Appeal No. 172 of 2026, the High...
Search Results for "specific performance decree"
1083 result(s) found
Found 1083 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
4 Apr 2025The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...
- 295
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Against Tribal Defendant, Overturning High Court's Dismissal Based on Section 36A Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Court Held That Section 36A Imposes Restriction on Conveyance, Not Agreement to Sell, and Decree for Specific Performance Can Be Granted Subject to Obtaining Sanction, as Plaintiff Paid Rs.2,20,000 Out of Rs.2,25,000 and Performed Contractual Obligations.
15 Feb 2024The appeal arose from a dispute over specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 31.07.2001, where the defendant, a tribal, agreed to sell land...
- 796
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Collaboration Agreement Involving Continuous Obligations Barred from Specific Performance Under Section 14(1)(b). Injunction Granted to Restrain Marketing of Brand Products Till Agreement Expiry Date, with Termination Found Invalid.
18 Feb 2022The dispute arose from a collaboration agreement dated 01.11.1994 between the Appellant, Universal Petro-Chemicals Ltd., and Respondent No.3, Aral Akt...
- 156
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.
14 Jan 2022The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Heirs to Continue Execution Without Succession Certificate in Specific Performance Decree. Succession Certificate Not Required Under Order 22 Rule 12 CPC and Section 214 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 for Continuing Execution Proceedings Initiated by Deceased Decree Holder.
22 Oct 2019The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased decree holder Mallikarjun Koujalgi, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 23.08.2018 passed b...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.
3 Sep 2018The case involves two second appeals arising from a common judgment of the appellate court in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell ...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Barred by Limitation and Not Void for Uncertainty. Court upholds concurrent findings that the agreement dated 11.12.1980 was valid and enforceable, and the suit filed in 1994 was within limitation as the cause of action was continuing.
28 Apr 2017The appellant, Maria Fatima @ Silo Silva Coelho, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by the respondent, Vaman Narayan Kundaikar...
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.
11 May 2012The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Execution Order in Land Dispute — Execution Application Held Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Decree in Favour of Petitioner. The court upheld the executing court's finding that the petitioner was not a decree holder and the execution was barred by limitation under Order 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
20 Dec 2011The petitioner, Pandurang Sazo Gaonkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an order dated 12.03.2009 passed by the ...
- 112
