Search Results for "section 374"

853 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 853 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. High Court's Reversal of Conviction Based on Proper Appreciation of Evidence Not Found Perverse Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's judgment acquitting Ramjan Khan, Musaf Khan @ Mus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Subramani, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar on 02.11.2018 in S.C.No.21/2017 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hanumantharayappa, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in Sessions Case No. 81/2013 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of IA for Framing Additional Issues in Injunction Suit. Order 14 Rule 1 and 5 CPC does not mandate framing of issues on every factual controversy; only on material propositions of fact or law.

The petitioner, plaintiff in O.S. No.374/2016, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents to restrain them from interfering with hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...