Search Results for "section 36(4)"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing FIR in Non-Compoundable Offences Without Consent of Injured Complainant. Settlement with One Victim Insufficient to Quash Proceedings Where Original Complainant and Injured Party Opposed Compromise.

The appellant, Anil Mishra, lodged an FIR on 07.08.1999 alleging that he and Respondent No. 5 were beaten and injured by accused persons wielding fire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Satyawan, who was allegedly abducted and killed by the appellants due to a debt dispute. The prosecution's case was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Identity of Deceased. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Last Seen Theory Fails and Medical Evidence Contradicts Prosecution Case.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had reversed the trial court's acquittal and convicted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the failure of the appellants to explain the death of the deceased after being last seen together led to an inference of guilt under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

The appellants, Santosh Tanbaji Durge and Raju @ Rajesh Vasanta Gudapwar, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 364, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the offence of kidnapping for ransom under Section 364-A IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) for offences under Sections 363 and 364-A read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 387, 201 read with 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Raju @ Doctor Vyankatswami, along with co-accused Somnath, Rufas, Yogesh, and Naresh, was tried for offences under Sections 120-B, 364,...