Search Results for "revision against conviction"

846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Court Clerk for Criminal Breach of Trust and Forgery of Records. Property Clerk misappropriated muddemal property and amounts, and made false entries in registers, convicted under Sections 409, 466, 477 IPC.

The applicant, Kanhaiyalal Damahe, was a property clerk in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, from 1.6.2001 to 31.5.2005. During his te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Restores Conviction Under Section 138. Appellate Court Erred in Setting Aside Conviction Without Considering Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner/complainant, R.V. Nathan, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Jail Sepoy for Concealing Conviction Under Bombay Police Act — Non-Disclosure of Criminal Conviction by Disciplined Force Member Justifies Dismissal in Public Interest

The petitioner, Dnyanshwar Vithuji Ghude, was a jail sepoy (Rakshak) at Central Prison, Amravati, who joined service on 1.11.1964 and was confirmed on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Applications in Cheque Dishonour Cases Due to Non-Application of Mind by Trial Court. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is rebuttable and trial court must consider defence evidence before convicting.

The case involves three criminal revision applications filed by Rajat Jaiprakash Rastogi, Mrs. Gursimran M. Deol, and Lt. Col. B.T. Jade against M/s. ...