Search Results for "registered dealer"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Winding-Up Petition, Sets Aside Conditional Deposit Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute over unpaid dues under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 cannot be adjudicated in winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order dated 27 September 2017 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No. 192 of 2016, directing the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Finding that Crane Hirer is Not a 'Dealer' Under Lease Act. Transaction of Hiring Crane with Operator is a Works Contract, Not a Sale of Right to Use Goods.

The case involves a reference under the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Right to Use Any Goods for Any Purpose Act, 1985 (Lease Act). The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...