Search Results for "reasonable classification"

646 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 646 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Change of Land Use for Cement Plant in Sangrur Due to Violation of Master Plan and Environmental Norms Under PRTPD Act and Pollution Control Regulations

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) and writ petitions challenging a Change of Land Use (CLU) granted fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Muslim Divorced Woman in Maintenance Case — Family Court Has Jurisdiction Under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. High Court erred in holding that Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain application under Section 3 of the Act.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside an order of the Family Court granting maintenance to a Muslim divorced wo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minority Scholarship Schemes as Constitutional — Schemes for Minority Communities Do Not Violate Article 14 or 15(1) as They Are Based on Backwardness and Not Religion Alone.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the constitutional validity of two scholarship schemes for minority comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Navy Pension Regulation Denying Condonation for Voluntary Discharge. Regulation 82(a) of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 21, 300A as it applies uniformly to sailors discharged at their own request.

The petitioners, six former sailors of the Indian Navy, were discharged from service on compassionate grounds. They had served between 14 and 15 years...