Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Boat Owner in Bumper Ride Accident Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Petitioner not present at scene and no material to show rash or negligent act under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC.

The case arises from a tragic accident on 18 November 2010 at Calangute beach, Goa, where a bumper ride boat, while returning to shore, suddenly turne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove High Speed or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Madhukar Gaurishankar Swami, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, in Criminal Case No.482/1987 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries Under Section 304-A IPC. Accused's Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rash and Negligent Driving Was Sufficiently Established.

The applicant, Shri Mahadeo Pandurang Phadtare, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 304-A, 338, 427 of the Indian Penal Code ...