Search Results for "quality testing"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Devidas Malche, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No.25 of 2014 for the offence punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Seed Company Officials in Seeds Act Violation Case. Court holds that vicarious liability cannot be imposed on officers without specific averments of their role in the alleged offence under Section 6(b) read with Section 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966.

The petitioners, M/s Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. (a seed producer), its Deputy Manager (Legal) M.M. Chavan, and Senior Manager (SDM) Anil Kolte, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...