Search Results for "purshis"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Against Consent Decree in Property Suit — Co-operative Society Cannot Challenge Compromise Without Impleading Chairman Alleged of Mala Fides. Consent decree under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC upheld as valid compromise binding on society.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Nira and Palm Product Producers Co-operative Society Ltd. and its Secretary, Director, and a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Compromise Decree Valid Despite Alleged Fraud. Court holds that a compromise decree can only be challenged on limited grounds of fraud or coercion, and failure to prove such grounds results in dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The original plaintiff, Pandurang Shidu Chinchkar, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 324 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Amendment Application in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After 11 Years and After Commencement of Trial Held Not Bonafide and Would Cause Prejudice to Opposite Party.

The petitioners, who were defendants in Special Civil Suit No.123 of 1990 filed by the predecessor of respondents No.1 to 8, challenged the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Consolidation of Cooperative Disputes for Joint Trial — Revision Order Upheld. Common questions of law and fact justified consolidation under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarkude Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a dispute (No.254/2006) before the Cooperative Court, Pune, against The Rupee Cooperative Bank Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. Court holds that plaintiff proved his 1/3rd share in suit property based on prior partition and possession, and defendant failed to establish adverse possession.

The plaintiff, Baburao Maroti Hujdar, filed a suit for possession and separate allotment of 1/3rd share in C.T.S. No. 2168/110/B2 of Jalgaon against h...