Search Results for "punitive transfer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "punitive transfer"

119 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal of Development Officer in LIC Termination Case for Non-Compliance with Performance Benchmarks. Confirmation of Appointment Does Not Confer Immunity from Termination Under LIC Staff Regulations.

10 Mar 2026

The appellant, Mahesh Harikrishna Vyas, was appointed as an Apprentice Development Officer with the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) on 10.11...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing culpability to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

17 Feb 2026

The appellant, Raval Shaileshbhai Rameshbhai, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahesana, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenges to One-Man Committee's Final Employee Allocation Between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh Power Utilities. Allocation Under Section 82 of Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 Upheld as Final and Binding on All Parties.

7 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of miscellaneous applications filed by Telangana power utilities, employees, and associations challenging the fina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.

25 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Ex Parte Decree in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'ZITA' Infringed by Defendants' Identical Mark. Court holds that registration of assignment with Trademarks Registry is not a prerequisite for filing suit; plaintiff's title to mark established through assignment deeds.

30 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit against G.R.A.F. Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and Valence Health Care for infringement of its reg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Suspension of Senior Officer. Suspension order quashed due to non-application of mind and lack of material, considering officer's imminent retirement.

1 Dec 2014

The State of Maharashtra challenged an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 13 December 2014, which allowed the Original Application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)