Search Results for "protection home"

2015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Mother's Custody Petition for Minor Daughters Rescued from Brothel Under PITA. Custody of rescued minor victims under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 vests with Child Welfare Committee for rehabilitation, not with biological mother, to prevent re-exploitation.

The petitioner, Smt. Babita, mother of two minor daughters aged 15 and 16, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging orders of the Judicial Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of District Commandant, Home Guards, for Misappropriation — Termination Simpliciter Under Contract Does Not Require Prior Hearing. Termination Order Upheld as Non-Stigmatic and Within Contractual Terms.

The petitioner, Prakash Balwantrao Dethe, was appointed as District Commandant, Home Guards, Yavatmal in 1986 and reappointed for a five-year term on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Circular Restricting Pre-Litigation Counselling Under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Circular Discriminates Against Registered Service Providers and Deprives Women of Sound Advice, Violating Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The litigation arose from a Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation initiated by Dr. Jaya Sagade, a Professor of Law and Director of a service provider un...