Search Results for "prospective income"

421 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 421 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Multiplier Found Erroneous. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 9% interest under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the widow and children of the deceased Devabhai Mepabhai Bhuva, who died in a motor vehi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Driver in Motor Accident Case — Future Prospects and Conventional Heads Added. Notional Income Assessed at Rs.3000 Per Month for Self-Employed Driver Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Nashirkhan Dalmohmad Makrani, filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the common judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Pedestrian Hit by Auto Rickshaw, Enhancing Compensation. Prospective income and correct multiplier applied for permanent disability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rameshbhai Mangalbhai Machhi, a pedestrian aged about 30 years, was hit by a Piyaggio Chhakda (auto rickshaw) on 05.12.2010 while walki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Appeal by Pillion Rider Injured in Motorcycle-Rickshaw Collision, Enhancing Compensation. Court Sets Aside 10% Contributory Negligence on Motorcycle Driver and Increases Compensation for Pain and Suffering Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Ajitbhai Yusufbhai Jodhpana, was a pillion rider on a motorcycle on 22 May 2015 when a chhakado rickshaw driven rashly and negligently ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...