Search Results for "promotion seniority"

785 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 785 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Seniority List of Graduate High School Teachers — Directs Inclusion of Petitioner with Continuous Service from 1988. Sahitya Sudhakar Qualification Treated as Equivalent to Graduation for Seniority Purposes Under Zilla Parishad Service Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Jaiprakash Baburao Gaidhane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the final seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tool Checkers' Merger with Retrospective Effect in Service Law Dispute. Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for prospective merger of cadres set aside, holding that merger must be effective from 25th June 1985.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by employees of the Union of India, primarily Tool Checkers, challenging the order of the Central Admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre — Continuous Service Length Decides Seniority Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Education Officer's Order Upheld as Respondent No.4 Appointed Earlier, Hence Senior.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, and respondent no.4, Sunil Ananta Devkule, were both assistant teachers at New English School, Mandhardeo, run by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List in Zilla Parishad Service — Seniority Determined by Date of Continuous Appointment, Not Date of Initial Application

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by employees of Amravati Zilla Parishad challenging the seniority list prepared by the Parishad. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Seniority Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Police (Civil) Subordinate Service Rules. Inter se Seniority of Sub-Inspectors to be Fixed on Completion of Training as per Rule 15.

The appeals before the Supreme Court arose out of a dispute regarding seniority in the cadre of Sub-Inspectors of Police in the State of Andhra Prades...