Search Results for "professional misconduct"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Simple Hurt in Rape Case Acquittal Appeal — Appellants Acquitted of Rape but Convicted Under Section 323 IPC for Assaulting Prosecutrix.

The appellants, Sonu Babu Pival and Kanta Sonu Pival, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune on 14.8.1996 in Sessions Case No.379 of 1995. They we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Forfeiture of Cash and Fixed Deposits in NDPS Case Despite Acquittal of Accused. Court upholds forfeiture of proceeds of narcotics trafficking under Section 8(c) read with Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The appellant, Sankapaka Laxman Bhoomaiah @ Babu, was the original accused No.1 in NDPS Special Case No. 208/1989 before the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Scissor Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death by a single scissor blow during a sudden quarrel, without premeditation.

The appellant, Kamrujama Abdul Rashid Sayyed, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 955/1988 for the of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Interference with Censure Punishment. The Court Held That the Tribunal Cannot Substitute Its Own Discretion for That of the Competent Authority in Awarding Censure Merely Because Different Forms of Censure Exist.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...