Search Results for "presumption under POCSO Act"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence and Medical Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's testimony was tutored and medical evidence showed no injury.

The appellant, Kisan Harinkhede, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused to Adduce Defence Evidence in POCSO Case — Rejection of Plea by Trial Court Set Aside. Right to Fair Trial Under Section 482 CrPC Includes Opportunity to Present Defence Witnesses Even After Prosecution Evidence Closed.

The petitioner, Sri Periyaswamy M., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 452, 506 IPC set aside as medical evidence and witness testimony failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashok @ Bhaiyya s/o Magan Koli, was convicted by the trial court under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years.

The appellant, Kawadu Madhukar Atram, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case 70 of 2016 ...