Search Results for "phenolphthalein powder"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Rangnath Jagtap, was working as an Accountant at Mahatma Phule Magaswarg Vikas Mahamandal, Buldana, responsible for issuing sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gunwant Dhumbhare, a public servant, for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Junior Engineer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the demand of bribe, which is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, a Junior Engineer in the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pralhad Sadashiv Badole, a retired government servant and former District Fishery Officer at Wardha, was convicted by the Special Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Baliram Ghodke (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Forest Guard in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Khudaram Kshirsagar, a Forest Guard, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashanand Ramji Fulekar, was convicted by the 1st Additional Principal Judge and Special Judge (CBI) on 28.1.2009 for an offence punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as demand of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Deepak Ramgirwar and Vinayak Wakhre, were convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 161 read with Section 34 o...