Search Results for "pension recovery"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CAT Order on Pay Fixation for Regularized Employees. Court holds that last pay drawn before regularization must be protected and seniority must be counted from initial appointment as casual labourers.

The petitioners, who were initially appointed as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized after several years. They filed Origina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition Challenging Recovery from Pension for Government Quarter Occupation. Recovery from Dearness Allowance Without Statutory Authority Held Illegal and Quashed.

The petitioner, Smt. Mrinal Bhake, widow of late Sudhakarrao Bhake, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 8-6-2005 from the Assistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery from Pension for Alleged Overstay in Corporation Premises. Recovery of Accommodation Charges Without Notice and Opportunity Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Smt. Shilpa Liladhar Tayare, a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), retired as Chief Inspector (Enqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension and Recovery of Excess Payment. Employer's Order Reducing Pay Fixed at Retirement and Recovering Excess Amount Set Aside as Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Vijay Sambrao Bharati, a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of his employer that reduced the pay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Deduction from Gratuity for Cooperative Loan Repayment. Employer Cannot Deduct Gratuity for Loan to Cooperative Society Unless It Is a Government Due Under Rule 132 read with Rule 134 of Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The appellant, Ashfaq Husain, was a Section Officer with Zilla Parishad, Washim. Upon his retirement, the respondents (Chief Executive Officer, Block ...