Search Results for "penalty assessment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "penalty assessment"

589 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 589 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Bona Fide Claim for Exemption Based on Professional Advice Does Not Amount to Concealment or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars.

6 Apr 2026

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

6 Apr 2026

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reopens Death Penalty Review Petition for Open Court Hearing Following Constitutional Bench Precedent. The Court recalled an earlier dismissal by circulation and ordered an open court hearing based on Mohd. Arif v Registrar, Supreme Court of India, 2014 (9) SCC 737, which mandates oral hearings in death penalty review cases due to the irreversible nature of the penalty.

21 Mar 2023

The judgment involves a convict on death row who filed a review petition seeking a fresh look at his conviction for murder and death sentence, based o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Over TDS Disallowance. Disallowance of Rs. 57,11,625 upheld under Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 per goods receipt to truck operators under Section 194C.

29 Jul 2020

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment for the year 2005-2006 involving Shree Choudhary Transport Company, a partnership firm engaged in tran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Orders Issued in Trade Name Despite Proprietor's Participation — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Challenge to Notice. The Court held that assessment orders are not non-est merely because notices were issued in the trade name, as the proprietor participated in proceedings without objection.

15 Mar 2016

The case involves multiple sales tax references filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against M/s. Klip Nail Care and other respondents. The common q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Crown Consultants Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08 on 30 October 2007 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Under RTI Act for Non-Application of Mind — Body Not Substantially Financed by Government. State Information Commission failed to consider whether petitioner trust was a 'public authority' under Section 2(h)(i) of Right to Information Act, 2005 before imposing penalty under Section 20(1).

19 Dec 2013

The petitioners, Dr. Hedgewar Seva Samiti, a trust conducting an Agricultural Science Centre, challenged an order of the State Information Commission,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Deletion Upheld for Bonafide Claims. Claims for deduction under Section 35D and diminution in value of shares were bonafide and not concealment, following CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.

14 Aug 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that arbitrators are not bound to give reasons for each item of claim and that the award is not liable to be set aside for non-speaking nature under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

18 Jul 2006

The appellant, Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a contract dated 12/10/1985...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)