Search Results for "payee's bank account"

359 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Evidence Insufficient to Establish Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Chikkachowdappa, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Restores Process in Cheque Dishonour Case. Jurisdiction for Section 138 NI Act lies where cheque is deposited for collection, not only where drawee bank is located.

The petitioner, Dr. Kiran Laxminarayan Maheshwari, a medical practitioner at Murbad, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Shifts Burden on Accused, Which Was Not Discharged.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammad Yusuf, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complaint by Constituted Attorney in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Reinstates Process Quashed by Sessions Court. Constituted Attorney Can File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on Behalf of Payee.

The petitioner, Vilas Baliram Sawant, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which quashed the ...