Search Results for "ownership evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3104 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3104 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Eviction Suit: Co-owners of Dissolved Partnership Firm Have Locus to Terminate Tenancy Without Attornment or Public Notice Under Section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court held that the co-ownership arrangement was a family arrangement and not a transfer, and the defendant's conduct established jural relationship.

18 Dec 2019

The appeal arises from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiffs, seventeen individuals claiming as co-owners of a shop p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

16 Sep 2005

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Restores Trial Court's Decree of Declaration of Ownership and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Set Aside Parts of Arbitral Award on Partnership Trademark Ownership. Clause 6 of 2003 Partnership Deed Excluded Trademarks, Goodwill, and Name from Partnership Assets, Vesting Them Exclusively in Two Individuals.

6 May 2015

The Bombay High Court heard two cross-petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Transfer of Vehicle Ownership in Public Auction Not Distinguishable from Sale Simpliciter. State Government Held Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Accident Caused by Jeep Sold in Auction but Not Transferred in RTO Records.

21 Jul 2017

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Director of Health Services, filed an appeal challenging the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Cla...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal by Plaintiffs Seeking Declaration of Title by Adverse Possession and Oral Gift; Trial Court Had Partly Decreed Suit Granting Injunction but Denying Declaration. The Appeal Raises the Issue Whether Trial Court Erred in Rejecting the Claim of Adverse Possession Despite Long Possession.

23 Dec 2020

The dispute concerned a suit property bearing Sy.No.152/5 measuring 1 acre 4 guntas at Bilekahalli village, Bangalore. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Title Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Ownership Based on Adverse Possession and Valid Sale Deeds. Community land claim fails as plaintiffs failed to prove title and defendants established possession for over 12 years.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves four first appeals arising from a common judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem, in two suits (Special Civil Suit No. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Reverses Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Partition and Separate Possession. Court Holds That Plaintiff Proved Joint Family Status and Entitlement to Share in Suit Properties, Directs Preliminary Decree for Partition.

30 Jan 2025

The appellant, Sri. Chandrashekar S/o Channabasanagouda Harti, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Limitation. The court held that the trial court and first appellate court erred in dismissing the suit for possession based on title without properly considering the plea of adverse possession and the applicability of Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, whi...

Supreme Court

Title Dispute Over Suit Property – Second Appeal Allowed – Lower Court Findings Reversed. High Court set aside concurrent findings of the Trial and First Appellate Court – Plaintiff failed to establish ownership through title deeds – Revenue records do not confer title – Suit for injunction without proving ownership not maintainable – Appeal dismissed.

19 Mar 2025

High Court correctly held that plaintiff’s documents did not prove ownership. Revenue records are not conclusive proof of title. Oral partition clai...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)