Search Results for "overtime claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "overtime claim"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Owner and Insurer Vicariously Liable for Driver's Negligence Despite Breach of Instructions. The court ruled that carrying excess passengers does not absolve the owner of vicarious liability when the driver was acting in the course of employment under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Jan 2019

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the claimants, Malanbai and Vanita, challenging the judgment of the Claims...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Sep 2017

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit — Confirms Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Daughters Granted Equal Share in Joint Family Property Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

20 Aug 2016

The case involves a partition suit filed by the plaintiffs, who are the sons and daughters of Mahalingappa Wali, seeking a share in the joint family p...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that without a notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, contract labour cannot be deemed employees of the principal employer, and the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing absorption.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 passed by a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that the workmen in a statutory canteen run by a contractor are not entitled to regularisation as employees of the principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 in Writ Petition No. 35453/2003. The appellant in WA No. 1980/2010 is BEML ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute Regarding Canteen Workers' Status as Workmen of Principal Employer. Canteen workers employed through contractor held to be workmen of BEML Limited under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 due to statutory obligation to provide canteen.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by BEML Limited (formerly Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.) and the President of Mysore Division General Labour Associatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow and Son's Admiralty Suit for Compensation for Death of Chief Engineer on Duty — Claim Arising from Contract of Employment Not Within Admiralty Jurisdiction. No Maritime Lien Exists for Compensation for Death on Duty, and Suit Barred by Limitation.

8 Nov 2006

The plaintiffs, Alice Elizabeth D'Souza (widow) and Alwin Mathew D'Souza (minor son), filed an admiralty suit against Motor Vessel Magalam (defendant ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Daily Wager Not Entitled to Reinstatement for Failure to Complete 240 Days Service. The court held that the workman did not complete 240 days of continuous service in the 12 months preceding retrenchment, and thus the Labour Court's award of reinstatement with backwages was perverse and unsustainable.

7 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged the award of the First Labour Court, Pune, in Reference (IDA) No.36 of 1990, which directed reinst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Driver Found to Have Been Unfairly Dismissed. Employer's Claim of Abandonment Rejected as Unsubstantiated.

5 Aug 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Lachhiram Chudiwala, an employer, challenged the final award of the First Labour Court, Mumbai, in Reference (IDA) No.1159 of 198...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Revision of Wage Structure and Abolition of Concessions in Industrial Dispute. Employer Allowed to Abolish Bounty Concessions as Wage Structure Revision Principles Clarified.

15 Oct 1957

This case arose from an industrial dispute between Messrs. Crown Aluminium Works and its workmen concerning the revision of wage structure and the abo...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)