Search Results for "ostensible owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "ostensible owner"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Applicant Seeks to Add Averments Regarding Will and Tenancy Rights. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial but Before Completion of Evidence — Court Holds That Amendments Necessary for Determining Real Controversy May Be Allowed Even After Trial Has Commenced, Subject to No Prejudice to Opposite Party.

28 Jan 2026

The applicant, Ashok Gupta, filed an Interim Application (IA) in a pending suit seeking amendments to the plaint. The suit was filed for declaration a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Complainant's Failure to Prove Debt. High Court's Reversal Set Aside as Trial Court's Findings on Rebuttal of Presumption Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

27 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had reversed his acquitta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

21 Apr 2016

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Plaint in Copyright and Trade Mark Infringement Suit - Cooperative Sugar Factory's Suit for Infringement of Label Design and Trade Mark 'Bhingari Santra' Held Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

22 Sep 2015

The appellant, a cooperative sugar factory, filed two suits in the District Court seeking relief for infringement of its copyright and trade mark in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

25 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.

11 May 2012

The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Possession Suit — Finds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Suffer from Material Irregularities and Perversity. Suit for Possession of 12 Gunthas of Land Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Within Limitation Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

31 Aug 2006

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unverified In-Camera Statements.

30 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Pravin Nivrutti Pagare, Sunil Mahadeo Khandagale, and Vijay Premnath Gosavi, were detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Basement Premises. Agreement Not Proved and Relief Barred by Limitation and Doctrine of Part Performance.

4 Feb 2005

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement dated 30.11.1977 for the purchase of a basement-cum-god...

5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)