Search Results for "multiplier"

1237 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1237 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Student - Compensation Enhanced. Notional income of Rs. 10,000/- upheld, multiplier corrected to 18, future prospects at 40% granted, and conventional heads enhanced under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 02.09.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Phaltan, in MACP No. 15/2024, where...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Reducing Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Multiplier of 13 Applied Instead of 18 for Deceased Aged 48 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Naranbhai Parmar, who died in a vehicular accident on 25.02.2013. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.5,96,761 to Rs.7,26,700 with 9% Interest for Deceased Aged 45 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Smt. Tarawati, aged 45 years, died in a road accident on 07.02.2003 due to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Cross-Objection and Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,80,000/- to Rs.3,34,000/- with 6% Interest.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased 20-year-old man who died in a road accident on 23-07-2007. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Conventional Heads. Deceased aged 52, multiplier of 13 applied instead of 11, and amounts under loss of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses increased as per Sarla Verma and Pranay Sethi.

The appellants, widow and children of deceased Jugalkishore Bajaj, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased pedestrian held 50% contributorily negligent for crossing highway without care; insurer's liability reduced proportionately under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of a deceased pedestrian against the owner and insurer of a truck. The accident o...