Search Results for "minimum imprisonment"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Section 187 MV Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Dyaniyal S/o Malku Army, was convicted by the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Humnabad in C.C. No. 309/2019 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Pharmacy Education, Overriding AICTE. The Pharmacy Act, 1948 is a complete code, and the word 'pharmacy' in Section 2(g) of the AICTE Act must be read down to exclude AICTE's regulatory power.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of cases concerning the regulatory authority over pharmacy education in India. The dispute arose when the Pharma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences for Convicts in Multiple Criminal Cases Due to Hardship to Family. Court exercises discretion under Section 427 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to direct sentences to run concurrently instead of consecutively.

The petitioners, Navnit Madhukar Naik and his wife Priya Navnit Naik, were convicted in three criminal cases: Regular Criminal Case No. 105 of 2011 (o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Compensation for Alleged Illegal Detention — Mistaken Release Date Corrected Before Actual Release. The court held that a mistaken intimation of release date does not render subsequent detention illegal if the error is rectified before the actual release.

The petitioner, Suryakant @ Bandu Ranoji Andekar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a declaration that his detention in Yerawada Central Prison f...