Search Results for "license requirement"

648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Commissioner's Order Prohibiting Contract Labour in FCI Depots. Food Corporation of India Held Liable as Principal Employer for Direct Payment of Wages to Workers Under Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

The case involves three writ petitions filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and its officers, and a partner of a transport company, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Leave and License Dispute — Licensee Failed to Renew Agreement Despite Licensor's Readiness, Eviction Upheld Under Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The petitioner, Suhas Janardan Chavan, proprietor of M/s. Suhas Hydro Systems, was a licensee of an industrial shed admeasuring 4000 sq. ft. under a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Order on Solvent Licensing for Repugnancy with Central Order. Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 struck down as ultra vires the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 due to conflict with Central Order of 2000.

The Petitioner, Indian Small Scale Paint Association Society, challenged the Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 as being re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensee in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Cancellation of Entertainment Licence Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Denial of opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and disproportionate penalty under Section 33 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1954 set aside.

The petitioner, Nandlal Hiralalji Gupta, was the licensee of a lodge in Amravati, holding an entertainment licence under Section 33(1) of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellants Entitled to Possession of Suit Property Based on Title and Adverse Possession. Permissive occupation does not create ownership; respondent failed to prove adverse possession or valid title.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit plot and house. The original plaintiffs (now appellants) are the sons of Marotrao Dhobale, the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...