Search Results for "interlocutory orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "interlocutory orders"

1122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1122 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

6 Mar 2025

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Preliminary Issue Framing in Employee Status Dispute. The Industrial Court Correctly Held That the Question of Whether an Employee is an 'Employee' Under the MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue as It Involves Mixed Questions of Fact and Law.

10 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (employer), challenged the judgment and order dated November 13, 2021 passed b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Revision Against Abatement of Suit for Declaration of Hereditary Chiefship — Legal Representatives Brought on Record in Interlocutory Appeal Enure for Entire Suit. The Court held that the High Court erred in holding that the civil miscellaneous appeal abated due to abatement of the main suit, ignoring that the appellant had been brought on record in the appeal within time, and the principle of Rangubai applies.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order in a civil revision petition. The dispute concerned the hereditary chiefship (Khull...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application for Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Documentary Film 'Sindhustan' — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case of Co-Producer or Joint Copyright Ownership. The Court held that an oral agreement for co-production is not sufficient to claim joint ownership of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the Plaintiff's contributions did not amount to joint authorship.

11 Feb 2021

The suit was filed by Kabir Singh Chowdhry (Plaintiff) against Sapna Moti Bhavnani (Defendant No. 1) and others, seeking a declaration that the Plaint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Rejecting Application Under Section 151 CPC for Reopening of Evidence — Trial Court Failed to Exercise Jurisdiction Under Article 227. The court held that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC can be invoked to reopen evidence to secure ends of justice, and the trial court's refusal to allow the plaintiff to be examined in person was a failure to exercise jurisdiction.

31 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Jabeena Hussaini, represented by her power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order Curtailing Cross-Examination in Civil Suit. Cross-Examination at Interim Stage is Discretionary and Can Be Limited to Relevant Points Under Order 19 Rule 1 CPC.

14 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Albina Alen Fernandes, filed a civil suit against the respondents, Kelwyn John Nicholas Pereira and others, seeking declaration and in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Executing Court's Order in Partition Execution — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Objections Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC Must Be Raised Before Sale Confirmation.

27 Apr 2006

The case arises from a partition suit (Partition Suit No.945 of 1968) filed by the heirs of Bachhusingh, who died intestate on 24-11-1964, concerning ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)