Search Results for "heavy rush"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "heavy rush"

120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Passenger's Fall from Train. Fall from Running Train Due to Jerk or Push Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway is Liable Under Section 124A.

25 Sep 2023

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the judgment and order dated 8.10.2009 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Brother of Deceased in Railway Accident Claim — Locus Standi of Legal Heir of Deceased Claimants Under Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the appellant, as legal heir of the deceased original claimants, is entitled to continue the claim and the definition of 'dependent' under Section 123(b) does not bar the claim.

6 Mar 2020

The appeal arose from a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989, following the death of Samadhan Virbhan Bagul in a train accident on 24.0...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation to Dependents of Railway Employee in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Denial Based on Contradictory Evidence. Accidental Fall from Moving Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Employee with Free Pass Qualifies as Bonafide Passenger Regardless of Pass Recovery at Site.

9 Mar 2026

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 filed by dependents of a railway employee who died after falling from a train. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Valid Ticket Purchase Sufficient for Compensation Under Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the burden to prove that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger lies on the Railway, and failure to do so entitles the claimants to compensation.

18 Jul 2023

The appellants, being the dependents of the deceased Shailesh Gavai, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Dependents in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's attempt to board a moving train held to be an untoward incident, not self-inflicted injury, entitling dependents to compensation.

2 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dismissing the claim of the dependents of Deepak Nattuji Thakre, who died af...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal and Upholds Compensation for Accidental Fall from Train. Strict Liability Under Section 124A of Railways Act Applies, Even Without Proof of Railway's Fault, Where Ticket Found on Deceased.

4 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from the judgment and order of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, which awarded compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 to the dependen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to Service Tax on Advocates. The Levy Under Section 65(105)(zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 is Challenged as Ultra Vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265 of the Constitution.

15 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger. Burden of Proof on Railways to Show Negligence or Criminal Act Not Discharged Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

6 Jul 2018

The appellants, wife, son, and married daughter of Thippareddy, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, seeking compensation for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

16 Sep 2015

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Death Due to Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Parents of deceased son who died after being run over by train while crossing railway track held entitled to compensation as death was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on ground of negligence.

9 Nov 2022

The appellants, Ganesh Waman Waghmare and Kusum Ganesh Waghmare, are the parents of the deceased Shubham Ganesh Waghmare. They filed a claim for compe...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)