Search Results for "flat rate"

925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs.1 Crore Based on Negotiable Instrument. Triable Issues Raised Regarding Consideration and Liability of Defendants Under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Parag Jyotindra Gandhi, filed a commercial summary suit against the defendants, Jayant Narendra Mehta and Others, to recover a sum of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Interest Rate to 9% in Consumer Disputes Against Developer for Delayed Possession. The Court upheld deficiency in service but reduced interest from 15% to 9% per annum, following earlier precedent in Himanshu Arora case.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from consumer complaints against DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. regarding its residential proje...