Search Results for "fertilizer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "fertilizer"

95 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Discovery in Specific Performance Suit — Discovery Sought After Issues Settled and Evidence Led, Not Permitted Under CPC Order XI Rule 1A

20 Mar 2014

The appeal arises from a suit filed by NTPC Limited (respondent-plaintiff) in December 2005 seeking specific performance of a contract for supply of 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that petitioner failed to deliver cotton bales as per contract, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Jan 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Radhe Cotton Traders, a proprietary firm engaged in the cotton business, challenged an arbitral award passed by a Sole Arbitrator...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Sale Deed Found to Be a Sham Transaction Without Consideration. The court held that the respondents failed to prove the sale deed dated 02/01/1991 as required under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and thus the appellants remained the owners entitled to possession.

15 Jan 2014

The appellants, Hausu Dhondba Uike and Ganba Dhondba Uike, owned agricultural field Survey No.110 at village Wai. Due to poor financial condition, the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Under Essential Commodities Act for Non-Essential Commodities. Wheat and Rice Seized by Rationing Authorities Held Not Covered Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 or Control Orders.

8 Aug 2013

The petitioners, including M/s. Ace International, Pankaj Pranjibhai Thakkar, and M/s. Metro International, filed three writ petitions challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Against Scheme Framed for Public Trust Under Section 50A of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. No Substantial Question of Law Found in Concurrent Findings of Fact.

16 Apr 2013

The appellant, Anil Govindrao Shirkhedkar, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and orde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Applications to Recall Process in Cheque Dishonour Cases — Directors' Liability Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. The court held that the applicant, as a director of the company, was prima facie liable for the dishonour of cheques issued by the company, and the process was rightly issued.

10 Jan 2007

The applicant, Amit Mohan Inder Mohan Sharma, filed three criminal applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Cheque Dishonour Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice and Non-Compliance with Section 138 NI Act Requirements. The court held that the complaint did not disclose essential ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the demand notice was not properly served and there were no specific averments against the partners.

12 Jul 2006

The applicants, M/s D.P. Jain & Co., a partnership firm, and its partners Girish Jain, Dharampal Jain, and Deepak Jain, filed an application under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Court Fee Stamps. Section 52B of Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Held Inapplicable to Court Fee Stamps Under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

9 Jan 2006

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a civil suit for possession valued at Rs. 40,500 and paid court fee of Rs. 4,530 using stamps. The court ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)