Search Results for "family pension deduction"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partially Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case. Compensation Enhanced as Academic Marks Do Not Determine Earning Potential Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with Future Prospects Applied.

The dispute arose from a motor accident on 7 November 2014, where a motorcycle driven by Alan Holkar, a 23-year-old third-year BHMS student, was dashe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Forum's Order in Favor of Construction Worker in Welfare Scheme Dispute. Token Contribution Under BOCW Act Constitutes Consideration, Making Worker a 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated an appeal concerning whether a construction worker registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation of Rs.68,23,000 Upheld. Computation of Loss of Dependency Based on Deceased's Annual Income of Rs.12,00,000 with 50% Future Prospects and Deduction of 1/3rd for Personal Expenses.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the widow and son of Shivram Nake, who died in a road accident on 06.09.1995. The deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...