Search Results for "encroachment removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "encroachment removal"

351 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 351 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Cart-Track Public Road in Land Encroachment Case — Upholds District Collector's Order Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Cart-track even in patta land is Government land; encroachments must be removed following procedures under Sections 6 and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

29 Apr 2026

The writ petition was filed by M.Suresh seeking a mandamus to direct respondents 2 to 4 (District Collector, Tahsildar, and Village Administrative Off...

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Encroachment Dispute After Survey Reveals Patta Land. Revenue Authorities Have No Power to Evict Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 for Private Land; Civil Remedy Available.

1 Apr 2026

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 27.06.20...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Encroachment Removal on Temple Land Subject to Pending Patta Enquiry — Writ of Mandamus Disposed with 12-Week Timeline. Court Held That Authorities Must First Complete Enquiry Ordered by Single Judge in Related Writ Before Acting on Encroachment Complaint.

30 Mar 2026

The petitioner, P. Velusamy, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the 4th respondent (Tahsildar) to remove encroachment on Periyasamy Te...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus Against Encroachments in V.O. Chidambaranar Market, Salem. Court Directs Removal of Unauthorized Structures and Encroachments Within Eight Weeks.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, J. Prosezhiyan, filed a writ of mandamus before the Madras High Court seeking directions to the respondents, including the District Co...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Sarkar Poramboke Land in Writ of Mandamus — Petitioner's Representation to be Considered in Light of Eviction Proceedings. Court Orders Survey Report Submission and Enforcement Action by Revenue Authorities Within 12 Weeks Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, V.Ravi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 5 (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Minister's Order Confirmed Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Error. The Court held that the Minister's order dismissing the appeal against removal was not amenable to writ jurisdiction as no error of law or procedure was established.

16 Mar 2016

The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Against Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Upholds Minister's Order Confirming Removal for Misappropriation of Funds. Court holds that the Sarpanch's failure to deposit collected taxes and misuse of funds constitutes 'misappropriation' under Section 39(1)(b) and that the Minister's order was based on sufficient material and not perverse.

16 Mar 2016

The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Holds That Plaint Description and Map Sufficient Under Order VII Rule 3 CPC. The court restored the trial court's decree for removal of encroachment and possession, finding that the first appellate court erred in reversing on technical grounds.

25 Apr 2014

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for removal of encroachment and possession...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application as Not Maintainable in Civil Suit for Injunction — Order Refusing Temporary Injunction Is Appealable Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC. Revision Under Section 115 CPC Is Not Maintainable When an Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

31 Jul 2013

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants, Babybai w/o Skharam Pardeshi and Madansingh s/o Dharamsingh Pardeshi, against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal and Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal in Demolition of Unauthorized Footpath Stall Case. Court holds that a person occupying public footpath without valid authorization is a trespasser and cannot claim protection of principles of natural justice before demolition.

21 Aug 2006

The plaintiff, Vasant Marappa Shetty, was carrying on business in a wooden stall admeasuring 2.28 meters situated on the footpath of RTO Lane Naka, Lo...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)