Search Results for "employee provident fund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "employee provident fund"

648 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Employer's Writ for ABRY Scheme Benefits — Late ECR Filing Not Fatal to Claim. Clause 5 of ABRY Scheme 3.0 Interpreted as Directory, and Baseline Employees Cannot Be Reduced Retrospectively by EPFO.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Lakshmi Electrical Drives Corporate Services LLP, a manpower services provider in Tamil Nadu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Old Pension Scheme Benefits to Part-Time Physical Training Instructor. Petitioner's continuous service from 1987 to 2016 qualifies for pension under the Old Pension Scheme despite initial part-time appointment.

3 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Mrs. Pratibha Suryakant Kale, was appointed as a Part-Time Physical Training Instructor on a fixed pay at Yashodabai Khare Junior Coll...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Retired Employees in Cooperative Bank Pension Dispute - Pension Scheme Cannot Be Unilaterally Discontinued After Employees Have Opted and Availed Benefits Under Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Banks Employees Pension, Family Pension and General Provident Fund Rules, 1989. The Court held that pension is a deferred wage and accrued right, and amendments to service rules under Section 84A(2) of Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 must be prospective, protecting employees' legitimate expectations.

11 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.'s decision to discontinue a pension scheme introduced in 1989 f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prohibitory Order Against Contractor in EPF Recovery Proceedings — Third Party Debtor Cannot Be Restrained Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 8G of EPF Act. The court held that a prohibitory order under Section 8G of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires prior determination of the debt owed by the third party to the employer, and cannot be issued solely on the basis of a recovery certificate against the employer.

18 Nov 2025

The petitioner, B.T. Kadlag Constructions, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging PF Recovery Orders Due to Delay and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner failed to challenge Section 7A order within limitation and bypassed statutory appeal under Section 7I of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

2 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s Siddhi Engineering, a factory located in MIDC Waluj, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Chairman of Sugar Factory in Provident Fund Embezzlement Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 14A of Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. Non-deposit of provident fund contributions cannot be prosecuted under IPC without prior sanction under the EPF Act.

26 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Dr. Ramprasad Ganeshlal Bajaj, was the Chairman of Jai Mahesh Sugar Industries, a private sugar factory. The factory deducted providen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Payment of Gratuity and Provident Fund to Retired Employee in Service Law Case — Employer's Denial Based on Pending Criminal Proceedings Without Departmental Inquiry Held Unjustified. Statutory Right to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Cannot Be Withheld Without Disciplinary Proceedings, and Provident Fund Being Employee's Own Contribution Cannot Be Withheld.

29 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Sayyed Shabbir s/o Sayyed Karim, a retired employee of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Option to Voluntary Retiree in State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Case — Regulation 18 of Pension Regulations Applies for Eligibility, Not Just Calculation. The court held that the bank's communication denying pension eligibility under Regulation 18 was erroneous and directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's pension option.

21 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Vandana w/o Eknath Bhondwe, a retired employee of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (now State Bank of India), filed a writ petition chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Invalidity Pension Under Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 — Employee Suffering Total and Permanent Disablement Due to Accident Entitled to Pension Despite Not Being in Service at Time of Application. The Court held that the condition of being in service at the time of application is not a precondition for invalidity pension under Section 16 of the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, as the disablement occurred while the employee was in service.

23 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Avinash Anant Vaidya, was employed as a Sales Manager with M/s Kopran Limited since 1995. He had a touring job and would travel across...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)