Search Results for "directory rules"

556 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 556 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Appellate Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Reasons.

The case arises from a Letters Patent Appeal against a judgment dated 2nd February 1988 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Reduction of Debarment Penalty in Solid Waste Tender Dispute. Court Considers Whether Appeal Against Debarment Order Was Maintainable Under Contractor Registration Rules, 1992.

The dispute arose from a tender floated by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 08.05.2018 for transportation of municipal solid wast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...