Search Results for "depreciation actually allowed"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Case on Disallowance of Excess Cane Price Paid by Cooperative Society. Excess Payment Over Statutory Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Held Not Deductible as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay against the assessee, Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Sikhar Karkhana Limited, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Shares of Foreign Company Not Taxable in India. Shares of a Bermuda company transferred outside India do not constitute transfer of a capital asset situated in India under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Techpac Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda, challenged an assessment order dated 25th March 2013 passed by the Deputy Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Reference on Section 35B Deduction and Doctrine of Merger. Commissioner Cannot Reopen Allowed Deduction After Appeal Merger Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case is an income tax reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Income-tax, B...