Search Results for "decree holder auction purchaser"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Auction Purchaser's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interest Claim on Fixed Deposit in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Interest on Fixed Deposit Accrues to the Decree Holder, Not the Auction Purchaser, Under Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner, Sri S.R. Venkatesh Babu, was the auction purchaser of a portion of the subject property in Execution Petition No.2420/2002 pending bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction — Orders Passed Without Deciding Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Are Illegal. Trial Court Must First Decide Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Before Proceeding with Interim Applications.

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 13.04.2017 and 17.07.2017 passed by the X...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Proved and Time Not Essence. Plaintiff failed to establish execution of agreement for sale and readiness and willingness to perform, leading to dismissal of suit for specific performance.

The appellant, Shaikh Hidayat, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of property admeasuring about 11920 sq. mtrs. at Borda, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Right to Argue in Execution Proceedings. Repeated Adjournments and Non-Compliance with Cost Order Justify Forfeiture Under Order 21 CPC.

The petitioner, Robert Meghraj Wanjari, was the judgment debtor in Special Summary Suit No.1 of 2010, where a decree was passed against him. He filed ...