Search Results for "court under Section 195 CrPC"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Under Section 193 IPC Against Accused in False Statement Case — Statements Made in Departmental Enquiry Not Before Court of Law. Section 193 IPC Requires False Evidence in Judicial Proceedings; Statements Before Departmental Enquiry Do Not Attract Offence.

The petitioner, Appasaheb Baburao Shinde, was the original accused No.4 in a complaint filed by respondent No.2, Sachin Mahadeo Vaidya, before the Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 295A IPC and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim for Alleged Illegal Detention in Murder Case — Section 433-A CrPC Mandates Minimum 14 Years Actual Imprisonment for Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC, Remission Cannot Reduce Sentence Below 14 Years.

The petitioner, Taranjitsingh alias Ranjitsingh, was arrested on 30.08.1975 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He was acquitted by the Sessions Court i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.7 in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Failure to Prove Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Leads to Setting Aside of Summoning Order.

The petitioner, Prasad S/o Veerayya Kulkarni, who was accused No.7 in C.C.No.790/2016 pending before the Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Nippani, filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Defamation Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Legal Practitioners as Public Servants Require Sanction for Prosecution for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty.

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, Anantrao Shankarrao Jagtap (original accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...