Search Results for "contradictory pleadings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "contradictory pleadings"

294 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court's Review Order in Mutation Dispute — Review Power Cannot Be Used to Rehear Merits After Dismissal of SLP. The High Court's review order was set aside as it sought to re-examine the merits after the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP against the original judgment, and the contempt petition was barred by limitation.

1 Jan 2024

The present appeals arise from a long-standing property dispute concerning land known as 'Asman Jahi Paigah' in Raidurg village. The original suit for...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Declaration and Possession. Court holds that the First Appellate Court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, rendering its judgment unsustainable.

17 Mar 2023

The appellant, Sri Gundappa, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Will Execution Not Proved as Attesting Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

31 Jan 2020

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in Regular Civil Appea...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Daughter's Partition Appeal Against Brother and Mother, Holding Father's Properties as Self-Acquired and Not Ancestral. Daughter Entitled to Equal Share Under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Will Not Proved.

20 Dec 2019

The appellant, M. Shobha, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree date...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Karnataka Rent Act — Tenant Failed to Establish Landlord-Tenant Relationship with Respondent. The court held that the petitioner, who claimed tenancy under a partnership firm, could not prove that the respondent was the landlord entitled to receive rent under Section 43 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 2001.

23 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Surendra Nayak, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 27.06.2016 passed by the III Additional District Judge, D.K., Mangal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Floater Policy Interpretation Upheld. Court remits issue of loss assessment for reconsideration under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, had obtained a Fire and Special Perils Policy from the respondent, National Insurance Company Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

12 Oct 2012

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Property Dispute - Adverse Possession Claim Fails. Petitioner failed to prove continuous possession for 12 years under Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute where the petitioner, Rajaram Rakshe, filed a writ petition against the respondents, who are heirs of Hasan Husse...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Adverse Possession. The court held that the lower appellate court failed to properly analyze evidence regarding the starting point of limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the plea of adverse possession.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute in Velim, Goa. The appellants (legal heirs of Egidio Joaquim Fernandes and others) filed a suit for possession of...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)