Search Results for "confiscation order"

478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty and Confiscation Orders in Sand Mining Cases for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for lack of hearing; matters remanded for fresh consideration.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. In Writ Petition No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Union of India in Customs Gold Confiscation Case — Confessional Statements Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962 Are Admissible Evidence and Cannot Be Discarded Without Proof of Coercion.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Abdulla Gulam Mustafa, challenged a detention order dated 27.11.2003 issued by the Principal Secretary (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...