Search Results for "composite application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "composite application"

542 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default Due to Counsel's Negligence. Negligence of Advocate Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioners, legal representatives of Sardar Himmatbhai Khokar, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.794 of 2002 seeking cancellation of a sale deed date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.

17 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

6 Dec 2024

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Two Persons in Tempo Accident. Held that the insurance company failed to prove breach of policy conditions and that the driver's license was valid at the time of accident.

18 Sep 2019

The present appeals arise out of two separate claim petitions filed by the legal representatives of two deceased persons who died in a motor vehicle a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Cannot Be Held Guilty of Contributory Negligence. The court held that a pillion rider has no control over the vehicle and cannot be attributed negligence unless there is specific evidence of active intervention.

7 Jan 2019

The appellant, a pillion rider on a motorcycle, was injured in an accident involving a tractor. He filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Cl...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income as Shikshan Sewak Assessed at Rs.19,000 per Month Based on 6th Pay Commission. Compensation of Rs.44,21,000 Upheld as Just and Proper.

17 Apr 2017

The case involves an appeal filed by Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award o...

High Court

High Court Sanctions Composite Scheme of Arrangement and Amalgamation Involving Transfer of Business and Reduction of Capital — No Objection from Regional Director or Income Tax Department.

2 Jul 2015

The High Court of Bombay considered two company scheme petitions seeking sanction of a composite scheme of arrangement and amalgamation. The transfero...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recalling Witness in Election Petition — No Power to Recall Witness After Cross-Examination Under CPC and Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court held that Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC does not permit recall of a witness for further cross-examination after discharge, and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to circumvent specific provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from an election petition filed by Ravindra Ramji Mundhe (petitioner) challenging the election of Avadhoot Anil Tatkare (respondent No...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)