Search Results for "caste correction"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Caste Category Change in NEET-PG 2025 Application After Deadline. No provision exists for modification of category after last date of application, and the application process must attain finality.

The petitioner, Dr. C. Anusha, a medical graduate who completed MBBS, appeared for the NEET-PG 2025 examination for admission to postgraduate medical ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of PwD-OBC Candidate for MBBS Admission Despite Inadvertent Error in NEET Application Form. Court Directs Admission Based on Disability Certificate and Provisional Selection Letter, Emphasizing Substantive Rights Over Technical Errors Under RPwD Act, 2016.

The petitioner, Shahid Akeel Shaikh, a 20-year-old student with a 40% locomotor disability, filed a writ petition seeking admission to the MBBS course...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Applications for Directions in Karnataka Reservation Case. No Fresh Cause of Action Arises from Implementation of Reservation Act 2018 After Final Judgment.

The Supreme Court dismissed three miscellaneous applications filed by 277 applicants seeking directions for the implementation of the Karnataka Extens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Offensive Language Not Uttered in Public View, Essential Ingredient Under Section 3(1)(ix) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Missing.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dr. Rahul Dharmaraj Khade, a Sub Divisional Police Officer in Gadchiroli, challenging the r...