OSA. No. 16 of 2023
24 Mar 2025The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras arose out of a construction contract dispute between Tamil Nadu Housing Board (the employer) ...
Search Results for "building contractor"
754 result(s) found
Found 754 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Permitting Composite Tenders for Civil and Electrical Works in Contractual Matters. The Court held that the decision in Aurangabad Electrical Contractors Association v. State of Maharashtra was incorrect as it interfered with policy decisions without showing arbitrariness or mala fides.
5 Sep 2019The case arose from a reference by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court questioning the correctness of an earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 3...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Central Government Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Regularization of Contract Labour at Hindustan Petroleum Refinery. The Court examines whether contract workers engaged through licensed contractors should be absorbed as permanent employees under notifications under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.
4 Mar 2010This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2, Mumbai, which direct...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.
8 Jun 2026These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Allotment in APMC Construction Contracts. Court upholds validity of tender process where lowest bidder was not disqualified despite minor technical discrepancies, emphasizing that courts should not interfere in tender matters unless there is clear arbitrariness or mala fides.
7 Jul 2016The petitioner, M/s. Mana Constructions, challenged the allotment of two construction contracts by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), K...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Toll Collection Tender Dispute. Variation in Contract Period from 90 Weeks to 52 Weeks Constitutes Counter-Offer, Not Acceptance, Thus Forfeiture Invalid.
1 Apr 2014The petitioner, M/s Abhay Construction, a partnership firm, submitted a tender to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. for collecti...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Defence Transport Contract Dispute. Contractor Held Liable for Loss Despite Alleged Insistence by Respondent on Unsuitable Trailer.
10 Mar 2010The petitioner, Shiv Ganga Transport Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, the President of India through the Commandant, Emba...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Contractor's Writ Petition for Mandamus — Directs Release of Balance Payment for Work Executed Under Scheme. Unilateral Deduction Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Right to Payment.
30 Jan 2014The petitioner, a Class-I PWD Contractor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Compensation for Delay but Sets Aside Award of Interest on Mobilisation Advance. Arbitrator's findings on delay and compensation held plausible, but interest on mobilisation advance contrary to contract terms under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Feb 2019The case arises from a construction contract between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Petitioner) and S.N. Thakkar Construction Company Pr...
- 125
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.
8 Jul 2026The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...
- 35
