Search Results for "benami transactions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "benami transactions"

67 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging PMLA Provisional Attachment Order — Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court Held That Attachment of Proceeds of Crime Under Section 5 of PMLA Does Not Require Prior Adjudication and Petitioner's Claim of Innocent Ownership Requires Evidence at Adjudication Stage.

2 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Jayamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the provisional attachment ord...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal in Title Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property. Declaration of Title Denied as Sale Deed Did Not Contain Approved Layout Plan and Plaintiff Failed to Establish Continuous Possession.

6 Feb 2026

The appellant, T.S. Krishnamoorthy, filed an appeal against the dismissal of his suit O.S. No. 13520 of 2010 by the VII Additional Judge, City Civil C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Complaint under Sections 406, 408, 409, 465, 471, 420 IPC Quashed as Transaction was Purely Civil.

13 Oct 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Archera Consultancy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of proceeding...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Suit in Rajasthan Rent Act Case — Limitation Bar Under Section 14(3) Does Not Apply Where Tenancy Predates Purchase by Landlord. The Court held that the bar under Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 is not absolute and can be waived, and the relevant date for computing the five-year period is the date of original letting, not the date of purchase by the landlord.

5 May 2023

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute over a shop in Jaipur. The appellant, Ravi Khandelwal, purchased the property on 30.01.1985 from its erstw...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Purchaser in Scheduled Caste Land Transfer Dispute — Migrant Scheduled Caste Status Cannot Be Claimed in Another State for Land Transactions Under Rajasthan Tenancy Act and Colonization Act. The Court held that a person recognized as Scheduled Caste in Punjab cannot claim the same status in Rajasthan for purchasing land from a Scheduled Caste allottee, and compounding under Section 13A does not validate the void transfer.

20 Oct 2021

The dispute pertains to agricultural land in Rajasthan originally allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste person. In 1972, Chunilal borrowed Rs.5000 f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Revision Against Dropping of Charges Against Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan in Adarsh Housing Society Scam. Court holds that sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and its absence vitiates proceedings.

19 Nov 2014

The case pertains to the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society scam, where government land admeasuring about 3758 sq.mtrs in Block-VI at Colaba, Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute, Directs Security for Full Claim Amount Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for attachment before judgment for the entire claim, as the defendant had refused to accept goods and was attempting to alienate property.

17 Apr 2013

The appellant, Herald Engineers, filed a suit against Wonderpack Industries Pvt Ltd and another respondent for recovery of Rs.40,36,567/-. The suit wa...

5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)