Search Results for "asset reconstruction"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment Over Bank's Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act — Priority of Secured Creditor Upheld. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over crown debts, and attachment by sales tax authorities cannot defeat the bank's security interest.

The petitioner, Union Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an attachment order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Bona Fides of Insolvency Proceedings by Telecom Service Providers to Avoid AGR Dues. The Court held that no fresh dispute on AGR dues can be raised after final judgment and that spectrum cannot be subject of IBC proceedings.

The Supreme Court was hearing miscellaneous applications in the ongoing litigation concerning the definition of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) and the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding Up Order in Company Petition by Asset Reconstruction Company. ARCIL as assignee of debt is entitled to maintain winding up petition under Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal was filed by Horizon Flora India Limited against an order of the learned single Judge dated 16 July 2010 in Company Petition No. 189 of 200...