Search Results for "allottee"

398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Orders in Kachchh District for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Notice Under Land Revenue Code. Orders Passed Without Hearing Petitioner Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Kirit Mulji Shah, filed two Special Civil Applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Sale of Housing Board Site, Upholds Validity of Sale Deed and Rejects Review Petition. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the sale was validly executed by the Karnataka Housing Board in favor of the trust.

The petitioner, Mr. Adinarayanasetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Cancellation of Shack Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice. Director of Tourism's Orders Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Grounds and No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioners, Alex J. Fernandes and Agustinho Coutinho, were allotted shacks at Umtawado, Calangute, Goa under the Tourism Policy 2016-2019 after a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved. Concurrent findings of courts below upheld that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and suit was barred by limitation under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Smt. Doshmani w/o. Vasantlal Bahoria, filed a Second Appeal against the judgment and order dated 26.4.2007 passed by the Adhoc District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals in MHADA Eviction Case — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Appellant's claim for tenancy rights rejected as he failed to prove lawful possession under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. The appel...