Search Results for "agreed map"

187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Orders Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness, but defendants cannot forfeit earnest money without proof of loss.

The original plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.02.2008 in respect of a suit property admeasuring 70,000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pandurang Keshav Jamble, a City Survey Officer in the Revenue Department of Maharashtra, was convicted by the trial court for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager and Co-accused in Branch Arson Case. Probation Benefit Denied for Offence Under Section 436 IPC as It Carries Life Imprisonment.

The case arises from an incident where the Poladpur branch of Mahad Co-Operative Urban Bank was set on fire on the night of 5th/6th September 1986. Th...