Search Results for "adverse entry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "adverse entry"

1003 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1003 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Tenancy Act Case Due to Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Notice Issued After 14 Years Regarding Land Transactions Was Barred as Statutory Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Under Sections 63 and 84C of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners, constrained to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a show cause notice dated 12.12.201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Possession and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Encroachment.

29 Nov 2023

The plaintiff, Bhagwatrao Randive, filed a suit for possession and permanent injunction against his brother, Panditrao Randive, alleging encroachment ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Police Recruitment Case — Upholds Candidature of Appellant Found Eligible Despite Typographical Error in Application. Error in Date of Birth Column Did Not Render Candidate Disqualified Where Actual Age Was Within Limits and No Fraud Was Alleged.

25 Aug 2023

The appellant, Aish Mohammad, applied for the post of Constable in the Haryana Police. In the application form, he inadvertently entered his date of b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Adverse Possession Case — Khasra Entries Found Suspicious and Fraudulent. High Court's Reversal of First Appellate Court's Findings Set Aside as Perverse and Without Considering Evidence of Fraud.

1 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court allowed two civil appeals arising from a dispute over adverse possession of agricultural lands in Village Purani Chhabani, Guna, Mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

8 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when both lower courts have concurrently found that the appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over the suit property.

8 May 2014

The appellant, Dilipkumar Bherumal Kucheriya, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner's Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Decree for Possession and Mesne Profits Upheld. Court holds that a co-owner in exclusive possession of joint family property is liable to pay mesne profits to other co-owners from the date of demand, and that the suit is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute over joint family property between co-owners. The original plaintiff, Rangnath Shivram Medankar (since deceased, represent...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)