Search Results for "UNCITRAL Model Law"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "UNCITRAL Model Law"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Unsuccessful Party's Section 9 Petition in Arbitration Dispute — Maintainability Upheld After Supreme Court's Home Care Retail Marts Judgment. The court held that a losing party can seek interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the earlier Division Bench decision in Dirk India.

6 May 2026

The judgment arises from a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) against Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Case — Division Bench Correctly Entertained Writ Against Single Judge's Order on Section 16 Objection. High Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Not Barred Despite Availability of Statutory Remedy Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a challenge to an order passed by the learned Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute — Rejects Bias Challenge Based on Non-Disclosure. Failure to disclose by arbitrator does not automatically render award contrary to public policy under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; respondents waived objection by participating in arbitration without raising issue.

25 Apr 2023

The petitioner, HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against the respondents, Avitel Post Studioz Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Validity. Clause 18 of Development Agreement Held as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Reversing High Court's Dismissal of Section 11 Application.

7 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from a Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 between the appellant landowner and respondent developer for construction of an a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Relegating Plaintiff to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Non-Signatory to Arbitration Agreement Cannot Invoke Section 8 Against Willing Party. Amendment to Section 8 in 2016 is Procedural and Retrospective, But Does Not Confer Right on a Non-Party to Compel Arbitration.

17 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Smt. Sushma Swaraj, filed a suit for specific performance (O.S. No. 458/2014) against M/s Blue Valley Properties Pvt. Ltd. (1st defend...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Cantonment Board's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute. Limitation period for Section 11 application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from date of refusal to appoint arbitrator, not from request date, under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and no claim certificate does not extinguish arbitration clause.

15 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from three contracts dated 23.09.2000 and 17.09.2001 between Secunderabad Cantonment Board (appellant) and M/s B. Ramachandraiah & S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

27 Nov 2019

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Clause 32 of Work Order Held to Contain Valid Arbitration Agreement Despite Ambiguous Wording.

25 Oct 2018

The applicant, M/s. Jay Bhagwati Construction Co., a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Recall Dispute — Interest Rate Reduction and Pre-reference Interest Upheld. Court confirms that arbitrator can reduce contractual interest rate under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and award pre-reference interest under Section 31(7)(a) of the Act.

4 Mar 2015

The judgment arises out of eight arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.

18 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)